Making the Video
The video constituted a refreshing change to the typical end of course final presentation. Filming the video was enjoyable and it allowed Trey, Tom, and I to really think about the clinical problem, our device, and the implications behind designing the device. For our presentation, we decided to entertain different techniques and style to convey the message. We mostly used white-boarding combined with voice-over for the introduction and background on Rheumatoid Arthritis. This allowed us to draw certain diagrams to explain the physiological intricacies which inspired our bio-design. To address the needs statements, we wanted to added a personal element, so we had Tom introduce them on camera. Additionally, we thought it was best to show each iteration of our design up close, so that the audience had a chance to visualize the progression of the design. These iteration views gave insight into the flaws of the glove, what should be improved upon, and its positive features. Dr. Pudhorodsky, the rheumatologist who our team interviewed, gave us invaluable advice and feedback on our design, some of which is included in the video presentation. This feedback helped us construct the final iteration. But more importantly, his feedback gave us some considerations to think about, should our team continue to pursue an effort towards designing the device in Capstone or another class. Finally, we filmed a demonstration of the device on Trey “sleeping”; this was done because we thought the proper setting, being asleep in bed, would support the viability and validity of the product. Furthermore, this seemed to adequately convey its full functionality. Our presentation culminates with a critique on the device, which lists some improvements and limitations to consider. Again and for what it is worth, I appreciated the filming the video, as it was a new and interesting experience.
–Albert Schibani
BME Design 